Category Archives: Getting Promoted

Issues related to the promotion process at Pratt


Dear UFCT Member:

I am pleased to announce that the UFCT will be hosting our third annual “ARPT Forum” on Friday, September 7th, from 10:00 to [no later than] 3:00. This year’s forum will again be held at ‘Anima Italian Bistro’, 458 Myrtle Avenue (between Washington and Clinton), 718-422-1122.

Article XVI: Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure (ARPT) is the “due process” article of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) we have w/the Pratt Administration; the ‘heart’ of our rights and protections as Pratt faculty. Whether you are a visiting, adjunct, CCE, or full-time faculty member, your rank and status is inextricably tied to ARPT protocol. Whether non-tenured, on the tenure track, or already conferred tenure, it is in both our individual and collective [self] interest(s) that we all know as much as is possible about the development of ARPT “standards” and ARPT “procedures”.

The more educated the faculty, the stronger the ARPT process!

Please make every effort to attend. However, Anima can only accommodate about fifty of us. As such, please RSVP me via email ASAP. Seating is limited, so reservations will be made on a first-come-first-serve basis. It is my hope that yet again, we will have an overwhelming majority of some twenty-plus Pratt department/areas represented at this year’s forum.


10:00–10:30 cafe / biscotti

10:30–12:00 review of information packet, overview of recent contract negotiations, status of ARPT process, grievance history, implications of faculty “input” w/respect to curriculum development and review

12:15–1:30 lunch: pizza, beer, wine

1:30… open floor discussion, (looking ahead, what to anticipate going forward)

Lastly, if anyone is interested in giving a brief presentation or report at the forum of how ARPT is working (or not as the case may be?) in one’s department/area, by all means, please contact me.

Hope to see you there!

In Solidarity,



The Union will be conducting its third annual forum on Friday, September 7 (specific time and place to be announced) to discuss with faculty issues related to the promotion and reappointment process (“ARPT”–Appointments, Reappointments, Promotion, and Tenure).

Please mark your calendar and try to attend. In the past, important information has been transmitted & received.

ARPT (Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure) Issues, Fall 2010

Dear UFCT Member:

Please find attached the ARPT packet that was distributed at the September 10th: ‘ARPT Forum.’ Fifty-two members attended representing sixteen of some twenty-one Pratt department/area(s). It was a great success!  [The packet is posted underthe category ” ARPT Criteria and Documents,” at right].

For those who could not attend though, we discussed the tenets and provisions comprising Article XVI [CBA]: Appointment, Reappointments, Promotions and Tenure (which is reproduced in the attachment). I like to describe XVI as the “heart” of the Contract. In other words, without our collective due diligence in implementing recognized ARPT processes we the faculty will not necessarily be recommended for, or conferred, any such faculty action, be it: reappointment, promotion (change in academic rank), change of status from visiting to adjunct, CCE (tenure for adjuncts) or tenure for our full-time faculty.

Collective due diligence entails two principle fronts: (1) faculty involvement at the ground level in each department/area, and (2) the UFCT’s enforcement of the Contract w/respect to administrative procedures; seeing that all administrative tiers: Chair, Dean and the Provost are complying w/section 16.3 of XVI.

To reiterate, all autonomous departmental/area faculty PRCs (peer review committees) “shall develop standards of eligibility, fitness and evaluation; which shall include teaching effectiveness and professional competence and may include non-teaching responsibilities, Institute service and public service [16.2].” These standards should be clear, robust and transparent and tailored to the departmental faculty’s values w/respect to teaching and professional development: artist-to-artist, scholar-to-scholar, historian-to-historian…

Moreover, note the last sentence of 16.2: “The faculty in each Department and/or Area and in the Library shall set up such procedures as they deem appropriate to effectuate the foregoing.” It is this clause that gives the faculty — as a whole — in each respective department/area a “say” in how the faculty should proceed; who should be elected or serve on the PRC, the composition of the PRC, etc.

The UFCT encourages all faculty members to be as inclusive as is possible, to hold regular elections, to keep your colleagues informed and to continue fostering a greater dialogue amongst your peers about the ARPT process, irrespective of your faculty peers status. We are aware of the learning curve here; but I assure you, nothing constructive is gained when the process remains mysterious or when your faculty colleagues “don’t know…[?]”

In addition to a “template” or format for what developed standards might look like, and an example of one department’s “best practices” with regard to faculty procedures (again, elections…), you’ll find some examples of recommendation and non-recommendation letters in the packet attachment, as we discussed the challenges in writing said letters; how critical if a non-recommendation, how praise worthy if recommended? There are invariable subtleties here that you all will need to parse for yourselves. That said, there is wide agreement that said letters — in both cases — be as informative as it reasonable. Bottom-line, a non-recommendation letter is NOT a negative evaluation, and should thus be framed as such. We encourage the faculty to be as constructive as possible and reasonable.

Lastly, the UFCT discussed w/forum attendees a “bouquet” of fourteen grievances that were filed in spring, all ARPT related. These grievances were “mediated” in late June, and we are now reviewing which ones will go to arbitration. The grievances were primarily based on the Administration’s proclivity [at all levels: Chair, Dean, Provost…] to ignore the clear ARPT procedures expressed in 16.3; for instance, not granting the faculty applicant an “opportunity to append and affix” his/her own comments. Exercising your contractual right to append and affix at any ARPT administrative tier is crucial, as it “objectifies” the record as well as keeps the application on track. The absence of due process exponentially increases the potential for administrative “arbitrariness” and “capriciousness.” Strict adherence to 16.3 effectively counters any administrative attempt to prejudice a faculty action application.

In conclusion, departmental standards — as the faculty has developed them — are getting stronger-and-stronger. This is a great development as ‘clarity’ equals strength and vagueness equals weakness. We should flaunt our good works! As such, we urge all respective PRCs to send copies of your departmental standards [and faculty procedures] to: (1) your department Chair, (2) your school Dean, and (3) the institute Provost.

Moreover, would you please forward me and Suzanne Verderber (UFCT VP:; preferably as word document or pdf, etc., your department’s current ARPT standards as well. It is very helpful to the UFCT to have these standards on file as it is the first thing we will reference if considering a grievance on behalf of a faculty applicant. Moreover, there was uniform agreement amongst the fifty-two forum attendees that these standards be available on the UFCT’s website:, for your reference as well.

Best to all as we enter the 2010-2011 faculty action cycle. I’m sure it will be an interesting ride; but be assured, we have your back as we are in this together!

In Solidarity,


ARPT Forum to be held 9/10 at Anima–please RSVP

The second annual ARPT (Committees on Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure) forum will be held on September 10, 2010 from 10-2 at Anima, an Italian restaurant located at 458 Myrtle Avenue, between Waverly and Washington (on the south side of Myrtle).  Please RSVP to Kye Carbone if you are planning to attend (the restaurant can hold approximately 75 people) at

We will discuss how the ARPT process has played itself out in the past in various departments, and what to look for and be aware of in the future.

ARPT Forum: September 10, 2010

ARPT: Committees on Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure
(see Article XVI of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, available on this website).

Last year the UFCT sponsored such a forum for the first time, which was – as
based on the many responses we received – a rousing success [over fifty-plus
in attendance representing some sixteen Pratt department/areas!] At the
close of last year’s event, we agreed that such a forum should become a
perennial affair!

As such, this year’s forum will take place on: Friday, September 10th, from 10:00-2PM (I apologize to anyone who is teaching at this time and cannot seek a replacement as scheduling is never ideal when factoring in the needs of over six-hundred potential guests!) Lunch and refreshments will be
served; however, the location for the event — at this time — is TBA.

If you would be kind enough to simply return email me ( if you wish to attend, this will be very helpful in terms of our finding an appropriate space as well as our catering needs, etc…

A simple response: *“Yes, I plan on attending,”* is all I need at this
point. As we get closer to the date of the event I will send confirmation of
your attendance.

Look for my ‘Status Report’ in the next week or so; until then though, enjoy
what remains of the summer. I hope to see you on 9/10 if not before!

In Solidarity,


ARPT Forum a rousing success

The first ever Union-sponsored forum on the Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure process at Pratt was well attended, by about 50 faculty from every department at Pratt.  The event was historic in bringing together faculty from across the Institute to discuss Pratt's unique ARPT process, memorialized in Article XVI of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.  The discussion helped to clarify the faculty's role and rights in a process that is often greatly misunderstood, and uneven in its functioning across the Institute.  This will be the first of many such necessary events.